<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>@GamblingSEO &#187; affiliate-marketing</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gamblingseoconsultant.com/category/affiliate-marketing/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gamblingseoconsultant.com</link>
	<description>SEM, PPC &#38; Internet Marketing with a focus on iGaming and Travel SEO</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Dec 2011 23:58:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Google Screws Affiliates &#8211; what happened to &#8220;don&#8217;t be evil&#8221; motto?</title>
		<link>http://gamblingseoconsultant.com/21082010/google-screws-affiliates-what-happened-to-dont-be-evil-motto/</link>
		<comments>http://gamblingseoconsultant.com/21082010/google-screws-affiliates-what-happened-to-dont-be-evil-motto/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Aug 2010 19:33:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Niall</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[affiliate-marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Featured Articles]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gamblingseoconsultant.com/?p=148</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;Don&#8217;t be evil&#8221; is Google&#8217;s slogan and it can be found in the Google internal code of conduct. it&#8217;s about providing our users unbiased access to information, focusing on their needs and giving them the best products and services that we can Unfortunately for us affiliates, Google is only referring to serving their users with [...]


No related posts.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Don&#8217;t be evil&#8221; is  Google&#8217;s slogan and it can be found  in the Google <a href="http://investor.google.com/corporate/code-of-conduct.html">internal code of conduct</a>.</p>
<blockquote><p> it&#8217;s about providing our users unbiased access to information, focusing on their needs and giving them the best products and services that we can</p></blockquote>
<p>Unfortunately for us affiliates, Google is only referring to serving their users with this motto. They seem to have no qualms about taking the bread and butter from affiliates by moving into vertical space such as finance, travel and gaming. </p>
<p>Typing &#8220;Credit cards&#8221; into Google shows the usual few paid ads above the organic listings, but hello &#8211; squeezed between the paid adverts and the organic listings, we now see &#8220;Google Comparison Ads&#8221;, offering Google&#8217;s own Credit Card comparison facility.<br />
<img src="/images/googlecreditcards.jpg" alt="Google Credit Cards in the SERPs"/></p>
<p>Was there a need for this? I doubt it. Is Google providing superior services to their users than was not already available? Definitely not. Google is diversifying, and some might say, being greedy. </p>
<p>As well as providing search, Google&#8217;s primary business model was copying your content analyzing it and displaying their advertising around it. Publishers and web-site creators are essential to Google&#8217;s  business, and without publishers Google can&#8217;t  exist.</p>
<p>Recently Google has spent a heck of a lot of money buying data companies which will allow the search giant to KO a lot of small, medium and large online affiliates and businesses by essentially jumping the queue on search results pages, offering their own services before those of these affiliate web-sites. </p>
<p>In July, <a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/10486358">Google acquired flight information company ITA</a>, and recently Google is rumoured to have <a href="http://techcrunch.com/2010/07/10/google-secretly-invested-100-million-in-zynga-preparing-to-launch-google-games/">secretly paid up to $200M for shares of Zynga</a>, which owns the biggest social poker site in the world. When poker inevitably gets legalised in the USA again, will it be PokerStars and FullTilt which players flock to to play poker for real money, or will it be Zynga (which boasts millions of users, has no affiliate program, and which is  awash with bad players, also known as &#8220;fish&#8221;)?</p>
<p>No doubt many  <acronym title="Search Engine Optimisation">SEO</acronym>ers and finance site owners  are pretty cut up about the seemingly anti-competitive move that Google has made by planting its own advertisements in the <acronym title="Search Engine Results Pages">SERPS</acronym> (can anyone else bid on this particular lucrative ad-spot?). The same will no doubt happen in the travel vertical (we have already seen the near-death of the high-street travel agent due to the internet. Does anyone actually go to bricks and mortal travel agents anymore?)</p>
<p>It seems affiliate marketing is doomed if Google decides to take the cream at the top of every vertical for itself. First finance, then travel, then gaming.. what&#8217;s next? Pornography and dating? A world where Google&#8217;s own pornographic site is ranked above sex.com and redtube may not be far away! </p>
<p><strong>Is Google knocking the first nail into the coffin of online affiliate marketing?</strong></p>
<!-- PHP 5.x -->

<p>No related posts.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gamblingseoconsultant.com/21082010/google-screws-affiliates-what-happened-to-dont-be-evil-motto/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bing Shows Affiliate links in sitelinks</title>
		<link>http://gamblingseoconsultant.com/28092009/bing-shows-affiliate-links-sitelinks/</link>
		<comments>http://gamblingseoconsultant.com/28092009/bing-shows-affiliate-links-sitelinks/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Sep 2009 10:15:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Niall</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[affiliate-marketing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gamblingseoconsultant.com/?p=94</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This morning I noticed that Microsoft&#8217;s search engine Bing! is listing affiliate links in some sitelinks (the groups of links you see under some sites in the SERP listings). Example: The sitelink shown in the image above for 32vegas Casino on UKGF is actually an affiliate link (301&#8242;d via a .htaccess file). The link is [...]


No related posts.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This morning I noticed that Microsoft&#8217;s search engine <a href="http://bing.com">Bing!</a> is listing affiliate links in some sitelinks (the groups of links you see under some sites in the <acronym title="Search Engine Results Page">SERP</acronym> listings).</p>
<p>Example:<br />
<img src="/images/bingaffiliatelijnkssitelinks.png" alt="Bing Affiliate Links in Sitelinks" /></p>
<p>The sitelink shown in the image above for 32vegas Casino on <a href="http://ukgamblingforums.co.uk">UKGF</a> is actually an affiliate link (301&#8242;d via a .htaccess file). The link is sitewide in one of the tabs of the sidebar on the site in question, and is actually rel=nofollow&#8217;ed. Note that the URI may appear to be internal to a &#8220;dumb&#8221; spider (the link goes to to http://example.com/32vegas.com/).</p>
<h2>Pre-third-coffee thoughts on affiliate links in <acronym title="Search Engine Results Page">SERP</acronym>s:</h2>
<ul>
<li>The fact that Bing is giving sitelinks for something which isn&#8217;t even particularly emphasised or important is interesting, but not very encouraging in regards to spiders/search-engine technology working well to improve the user experience.</li>
<li> Would Bing! have indexed the link as a sitelink if it were awash with parameters and linked out rather than seeming to be an internal link (at first glance)?</li>
<li>This has got to be good for affiliates, right?</li>
<li>This is bad for usability &#8211; users will click on the link and bypass the desired web-site completely, perhaps causing confusion, and debasing all the good stuff the webmaster put in, in regards content creation, editorial costs, technical costs and on and off-site <acronym title="Search Engine Optimisation">SEO</acronym></li>
<li>If the site owner wants to ditch the sitelink on Bing! to help navigation and actually take users their own site content as expected, it seems that this site owner, and other webmasters need to monitor and occassionally edit their site-links using Microsoft&#8217;s Webmaster Tools!</li>
</ul>
<p>Maybe this is a temporary glitch from Bing, but for now, what does affiliate links in <acronym title="Search Engine Results Page">SERP</acronym> listings mean to you and to your users? </p>
<!-- PHP 5.x -->

<p>No related posts.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gamblingseoconsultant.com/28092009/bing-shows-affiliate-links-sitelinks/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

