<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for @GamblingSEO</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gamblingseoconsultant.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gamblingseoconsultant.com</link>
	<description>SEM, PPC &#38; Internet Marketing with a focus on iGaming and Travel SEO</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Dec 2011 03:34:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on How to get Fake Reviews &amp; 5 Star Ratings on Google&#8230; Even on Google&#8217;s Own Sites by langthang</title>
		<link>http://gamblingseoconsultant.com/18122011/how-to-abuse-microformats-for-improved-click-through-rates/comment-page-1/#comment-590</link>
		<dc:creator>langthang</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Dec 2011 03:34:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gamblingseoconsultant.com/?p=564#comment-590</guid>
		<description>i think Google will penalty :(</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i think Google will penalty :(</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on UK Newspaper websites selling links to online gambling spammers&#8230; Again.. by Niall</title>
		<link>http://gamblingseoconsultant.com/15122011/uk-newspaper-websites-selling-links-to-online-gambling-spammers-again/comment-page-1/#comment-574</link>
		<dc:creator>Niall</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Dec 2011 13:30:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gamblingseoconsultant.com/?p=561#comment-574</guid>
		<description>hey mark 
I&#039;d say the head honchos know rightly, b/c I tweeted at them asking them if they were employing idiots and trying to get banned from Google etc.

Your interpretation was correct for 2nd part. Thanks for reading / commenting :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hey mark<br />
I&#8217;d say the head honchos know rightly, b/c I tweeted at them asking them if they were employing idiots and trying to get banned from Google etc.</p>
<p>Your interpretation was correct for 2nd part. Thanks for reading / commenting :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on UK Newspaper websites selling links to online gambling spammers&#8230; Again.. by Mark</title>
		<link>http://gamblingseoconsultant.com/15122011/uk-newspaper-websites-selling-links-to-online-gambling-spammers-again/comment-page-1/#comment-573</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Dec 2011 22:50:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gamblingseoconsultant.com/?p=561#comment-573</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d love to know what the risk to cost benefit is for sites like the Express. Surely they are only getting a few hundred quid a month tops for links like that. I also wonder if the head honchos know what risk they are running doing it.

Can I please ask though, what do you mean by &quot;so the buyer can rank/brand parasites in the SERPs&quot;? I see they are deep linking to a page with a number of different brands on it. Do you mean just to get this type of page ranking?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d love to know what the risk to cost benefit is for sites like the Express. Surely they are only getting a few hundred quid a month tops for links like that. I also wonder if the head honchos know what risk they are running doing it.</p>
<p>Can I please ask though, what do you mean by &#8220;so the buyer can rank/brand parasites in the SERPs&#8221;? I see they are deep linking to a page with a number of different brands on it. Do you mean just to get this type of page ranking?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on How NOT to build backlinks for online bingo by Alex Eliades</title>
		<link>http://gamblingseoconsultant.com/21022011/how-not-to-build-backlinks-for-online-bingo/comment-page-1/#comment-566</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex Eliades</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Nov 2011 19:35:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gamblingseoconsultant.com/?p=205#comment-566</guid>
		<description>I got this exact email, agreed to work with them and publish their article on my site but I insisted on a reciprocal link from their blog. I put their article up, had poor communication and then waited for my link from their blog and nothing. Emailed a couple of times and eventually got an answer saying it would go up soon. I waited and waited and eventually removed their link from my site.

I do know though that this service is completely automated and from an agency (dont want to name names) hired by bingo.org.uk that I considered using myself but after the experience I had from a publishers perspective decided not to.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I got this exact email, agreed to work with them and publish their article on my site but I insisted on a reciprocal link from their blog. I put their article up, had poor communication and then waited for my link from their blog and nothing. Emailed a couple of times and eventually got an answer saying it would go up soon. I waited and waited and eventually removed their link from my site.</p>
<p>I do know though that this service is completely automated and from an agency (dont want to name names) hired by bingo.org.uk that I considered using myself but after the experience I had from a publishers perspective decided not to.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on 3DTV &#8211; SKY TV Risking the Farm by buying links? by Chris</title>
		<link>http://gamblingseoconsultant.com/16082011/3dtv-sky-tv-risking-the-farm-by-buying-links/comment-page-1/#comment-544</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Aug 2011 03:37:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gamblingseoconsultant.com/?p=333#comment-544</guid>
		<description>Sky not only buy links and rip off Google et al. They also rip off the general public at large; lest not forget News Corp hacking murdered girls mobile phones.  Hope they burn in hell. Idiot bastards.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sky not only buy links and rip off Google et al. They also rip off the general public at large; lest not forget News Corp hacking murdered girls mobile phones.  Hope they burn in hell. Idiot bastards.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on 3DTV &#8211; SKY TV Risking the Farm by buying links? by Matt Bennett</title>
		<link>http://gamblingseoconsultant.com/16082011/3dtv-sky-tv-risking-the-farm-by-buying-links/comment-page-1/#comment-543</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt Bennett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Aug 2011 13:12:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gamblingseoconsultant.com/?p=333#comment-543</guid>
		<description>Welcome to real world corporate SEO! I see this on a daily basis for &quot;best of breed&quot; sites within various sectors. The question is though, why would Google ban a brand that attracts such high search volumes and probably spends huge amounts on PPC? Wouldn&#039;t the negative out weigh the positive?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Welcome to real world corporate SEO! I see this on a daily basis for &#8220;best of breed&#8221; sites within various sectors. The question is though, why would Google ban a brand that attracts such high search volumes and probably spends huge amounts on PPC? Wouldn&#8217;t the negative out weigh the positive?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Google Major Brand SERP update? by Casper</title>
		<link>http://gamblingseoconsultant.com/21072011/google-major-brand-serp-update/comment-page-1/#comment-540</link>
		<dc:creator>Casper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Aug 2011 15:32:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gamblingseoconsultant.com/?p=370#comment-540</guid>
		<description>Same observation on Danish phone prices website:
http://www.amino.dk/forums/t/132643.aspx</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Same observation on Danish phone prices website:<br />
<a href="http://www.amino.dk/forums/t/132643.aspx" rel="nofollow">http://www.amino.dk/forums/t/132643.aspx</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Google Major Brand SERP update? by murphymarketing</title>
		<link>http://gamblingseoconsultant.com/21072011/google-major-brand-serp-update/comment-page-1/#comment-539</link>
		<dc:creator>murphymarketing</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Aug 2011 01:26:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gamblingseoconsultant.com/?p=370#comment-539</guid>
		<description>I doubt this will show up for generic type phrases - probably based on &quot;true intent&quot; of the search query.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I doubt this will show up for generic type phrases &#8211; probably based on &#8220;true intent&#8221; of the search query.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Google Major Brand SERP update? by Peter</title>
		<link>http://gamblingseoconsultant.com/21072011/google-major-brand-serp-update/comment-page-1/#comment-538</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jul 2011 09:26:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gamblingseoconsultant.com/?p=370#comment-538</guid>
		<description>Not seeing it here. Tried searching for a few brands, including GPWA, but just getting the usual site links.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not seeing it here. Tried searching for a few brands, including GPWA, but just getting the usual site links.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on How Online Franchise Buyers Can Protect Themselves From SEO Problems by bingoseo</title>
		<link>http://gamblingseoconsultant.com/15072011/how-online-franchise-buyers-can-protect-themselves-from-seo-problems/comment-page-1/#comment-537</link>
		<dc:creator>bingoseo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jul 2011 17:37:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gamblingseoconsultant.com/?p=340#comment-537</guid>
		<description>Excellent post Niall.
I remember when Bingo.com was acquired by Maria/Unibet. They totally botched all of the technical aspects of the transition from old site to new whitelabel site, meaning that bingo.com went from #1 on google for &quot;bingo&quot; to page SIX due to not redirecting / moving the old content to new pages etc.

Needless to say that you shouldn&#039;t ever assume a transition has been done correctly. TEST - TEST and TEST AGAIN.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent post Niall.<br />
I remember when Bingo.com was acquired by Maria/Unibet. They totally botched all of the technical aspects of the transition from old site to new whitelabel site, meaning that bingo.com went from #1 on google for &#8220;bingo&#8221; to page SIX due to not redirecting / moving the old content to new pages etc.</p>
<p>Needless to say that you shouldn&#8217;t ever assume a transition has been done correctly. TEST &#8211; TEST and TEST AGAIN.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

